SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills

Analyze design projects and match them to suitable design award programs, tracks, and categories. Apply eligibility rules, verify current official criteria, compare with winner trends, and output fit scores, evidence confidence, and submission priority.

Orchestrates a complete design award workflow, routing tasks like winner research, evaluation, award matching, and submission checking. Ideal when you need coordinated stages or aren't sure which specialist skill to use.

Finds verified award-winning designs from official sources like iF Design and Red Dot, using eight relevance dimensions to match your design's category and characteristics. Ideal for gathering comparable precedents, benchmarks, or appearance-related award winners.

Evaluate design quality through an evidence-based rubric. Scores design and presentation, identifies critical risks, and shortlists works within separate maturity tracks for batch evaluations.

Extract evidence-grounded project facts from user-provided design attachments, identify missing information, and prepare the exact written fields required by supported design-award entry forms.

Shared support package for the Design Judge skill collection. Install it with design-award-search and design-award-match so those skills can read the canonical functional-design taxonomy and official award-source registry. Do not invoke it as a standalone design workflow.

Audit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness.