🔬
QualityRust

Scientific Critical Thinking

by xintaofei

Scientific Critical Thinking is a Quality skill for Claude Code, published by xintaofei in codeg.

2.8K stars345 forkson xintaofei/codegAdded 2026/08/17+3% in starsRepository updated 2026/08/17
acpagentclaude-codeclinecode-generationcodebuddycodexgemini-cligrok-buildguihermes-agentkimi-codeopenclawopencodepiworktree
Install in seconds
Install Scientific Critical Thinking
Copy Scientific Critical Thinking into your Claude Code skills folder. Run the command in your terminal, or review the source on GitHub before installing.
terminal
npx degit https://github.com/xintaofei/codeg/tree/main/src-tauri/science/skills/scientific-critical-thinking ~/.claude/skills/scientific-critical-thinking

Requires Node.js. Downloads this skill only — not the rest of the repository — into your Claude Code skills folder.

Without Node.js

git clone https://github.com/xintaofei/codeg.git

Clones the whole repository, then copy the skill’s own directory into your skills folder yourself.

In this catalog

Source file
src-tauri/science/skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md in xintaofei/codeg
Installs to
~/.claude/skills/scientific-critical-thinking
Collection
One of 25 skills cataloged from this repository
Category
Quality1354 skills

What Scientific Critical Thinking does

Scientific Critical Thinking evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality, applying methods like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias to assess experimental design, statistical validity, biases, and confounding. Use it when reviewing research papers, planning studies, or conducting systematic reviews.

Scientific Critical Thinking is cataloged under Quality on DirSkills. Scientific Critical Thinking comes from a repository tagged acp, agent, claude-code, cline and code-generation.

Documentation

README

Scientific Critical Thinking

Overview

Critical thinking is a systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks. Apply this skill for critical analysis of scientific claims.

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Evaluating research methodology and experimental design
  • Assessing statistical validity and evidence quality
  • Identifying biases and confounding in studies
  • Reviewing scientific claims and conclusions
  • Conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses
  • Applying GRADE or Cochrane risk of bias assessments
  • Providing critical analysis of research papers

Visual Aids (Optional)

This is the opening of the README. Read the full README on GitHub.

Frequently asked about Scientific Critical Thinking

  • What else does xintaofei publish alongside Scientific Critical Thinking?

    Scientific Critical Thinking is one of 25 skills that DirSkills catalogs from xintaofei/codeg, the repository it ships in. Its siblings there include Brainstorming, Citation Management and Code Review Reception. Each one is a separate skill with its own page in this directory, installs the same way Scientific Critical Thinking does, and is maintained by xintaofei in that same repository. The rest of the collection is listed on the xintaofei/codeg page.

  • How does Scientific Critical Thinking compare to other Quality skills?

    Scientific Critical Thinking ranks #486 by stars among the 1354 Quality skills in this catalog. The most-starred ones next to it are Benchmark, Benchmark Optimization Loop and API Design Patterns. DirSkills ranks by the star count of the repository each skill ships in, so that order reflects how popular those repositories are rather than any review of Scientific Critical Thinking against them. Open each page to compare what they document and how they install.

More from xintaofei/codeg

Scientific Critical Thinking is one of 25 skills cataloged on DirSkills from xintaofei/codeg.

See all 25 skills
💡
2w ago

Brainstorming

Brainstorming turns ideas into fully formed designs and specs through collaborative dialogue, asking clarifying questions and proposing approaches before implementation. Use it before any creative or coding work to align on requirements and get approval.
AI Engineering
2.8K344
📚
2w ago

Citation Management

Citation Management searches Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extracts accurate metadata, validates citations, and generates properly formatted BibTeX entries. Use it when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.
Writing
2.8K345
🧪
2w ago

Code Review Reception

Code Review Reception establishes a verification-first workflow for responding to code review feedback, requiring technical evaluation and clarification before implementation rather than performative agreement. Use it when receiving feedback from humans or external reviewers to avoid blind implementation and ensure changes fit the codebase.
Quality
2.8K344
🤖
2w ago

Dispatching Parallel Agents

Dispatching Parallel Agents delegates independent tasks to multiple concurrent subagents to investigate and fix issues in parallel. Use it when you have 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies.
AI Engineering
2.8K344
📋
2w ago

Executing Plans

Executing Plans loads a written implementation plan, reviews it critically, executes all tasks with verification, and reports when complete. Use it when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints.
Automation
2.8K344
🧪
2w ago

Experimental Design

Experimental Design plans experiments and studies before data collection, choosing a design, randomizing, blocking, and laying out treatment combinations so results are interpretable. Use it when assigning subjects to groups, screening factors, or setting up factorial or response-surface designs.
Data
2.8K345