📝
Writing

Technical Writing

by luoling8192

Technical Writing is a Writing skill for Claude Code, published by luoling8192 in technical-writing.

211 stars11 forkson luoling8192/technical-writingAdded 2026/09/04Repository updated 2026/05/27
agent-skillchineseclaude-codecodexdocumentationtechnical-writing
Install in seconds
Install Technical Writing
Copy Technical Writing into your Claude Code skills folder. Run the command in your terminal, or review the source on GitHub before installing.
terminal
npx degit https://github.com/luoling8192/technical-writing ~/.claude/skills/technical-writing

Requires Node.js. Downloads this skill only — not the rest of the repository — into your Claude Code skills folder.

Without Node.js

git clone https://github.com/luoling8192/technical-writing.git

Clones the whole repository, then copy the skill’s own directory into your skills folder yourself.

In this catalog

Source file
SKILL.md in luoling8192/technical-writing
Installs to
~/.claude/skills/technical-writing
Collection
The only skill cataloged from this repository
Category
Writing1144 skills

What Technical Writing does

Technical Writing helps draft or revise internal technical docs, review notes, architecture writeups, and sharing posts in Chinese. It keeps the tone evidence-backed, calm, and suited to peers or leaders rather than marketing or literary writing.

Technical Writing is cataloged under Writing on DirSkills. Technical Writing comes from a repository tagged agent-skill, chinese, claude-code, codex and documentation.

Documentation

README

Internal Technical Writing

Overview

Use this skill when the writing target is an internal技术方案、评审稿、架构说明、分享文稿,重点在于把背景、猜想、证据、抽象、实现影响面讲清楚。

这类写作更接近技术汇报,不是宣传稿,也不该写成散文。语气要平稳,判断要有来路,段落要能顺着问题往下读。

When to Use

  • 在写内部技术方案、设计说明、评审文档、分享稿
  • 在改一篇已经有内容、但文风过满、结论过快、证据不足的技术文章
  • 在解释代码、模块边界、架构演进、可观测性、评测方法
  • 在把聊天记录、讨论结论整理成可传播的技术文档

When not to use

  • UI 文案、按钮文案、产品营销稿
  • 面向外部用户的帮助文档
  • 纯粹的 API reference 或机械说明书

Core Stance

先接住读者,再往下解释。

常见写法是作者替读者抢先下判断,像 很清楚说明了显然真正。这里更适合换成三步:

  1. 我们观察到了什么
  2. 基于这些观察,可以归纳出什么
  3. 这些归纳暂时更适合落在哪类实现或组织方式里

如果要给出更强的判断,至少满足下面任一条件:

  • 前文已经提出了对应的猜想,这一段是在 callback
  • 同一段上下文里已经有交叉验证的 evidence
  • 已经引用了具体模块、代码、issue、trace、指标或实验结果

这些 bad case 往往有同一种共性:

  • 句子承担的是“主持文章”的功能,不是“推进论证”的功能
  • 句子在表达作者感受,不是在交代条件、对象、约束或判断
  • 句子把英文抽象写作习惯直接投到了中文里
  • 句子删掉以后,不影响事实,不影响论证,也不影响结构

This is the opening of the README. Read the full README on GitHub.

Frequently asked about Technical Writing

  • How does Technical Writing compare to other Writing skills?

    Technical Writing ranks #955 by stars among the 1144 Writing skills in this catalog. The most-starred ones next to it are Article Writing, Social Media Content Calendar and Knowledge Comic Creator. DirSkills ranks by the star count of the repository each skill ships in, so that order reflects how popular those repositories are rather than any review of Technical Writing against them. Open each page to compare what they document and how they install.